January 23, 2023 Sharad Vadehra, Aakriti Sharma, Aakriti Vadehra Madhya Pradesh High Court – Condom Ad featuring Couple Playing Garba does not Hurt Religious Sentiments View more December 28, 2022 Sharad Vadehra, Kanu Priya and Aakriti Vadehra Recent Notices by the Controller General of Patents and Updates in the Practice of the Indian Patent Office View more December 19, 2022 Sharad Vadehra, Shikha Baiswar, Aakriti Sharma Industrial Designs – Now Submit Documents and Forms Online View more November 23, 2022 Sharad Vadehra, Rachana Bishnoi, and Pragati Jurisprudential Aspects of “Shape Mark” under Indian Trade Marks Law View more November 23, 2022 Sharad Vadehra, Rachana Bishnoi, and Pragati “ZIPOD” vs. “ZOYPOD”: A Strict Test of Deceptive Similarity under Indian Trade Marks Law View more November 9, 2022 Admin Strong-Worded Advisory by the MIB on Advertisements of Online Betting Platforms View more November 9, 2022 Sharad Vadehra, Rachana Bishnoi, and Pragati Delhi High Court decodes Section 36E(5) of Indian Trade Marks Act View more November 2, 2022 Sharad Vadehra, Kshitij Saxena, Dr. Neha Gupta Indian Patent Office must Identify the Known Substance to Objectify the Claimed Compound under Section 3(d) – DS Biopharma Limited v. The Controller of Patents and Designs. View more 1 2 … 9