Blog grid

78oVdFSC_400x400

January 23, 2023
Sharad Vadehra, Aakriti Sharma, Aakriti Vadehra

Madhya Pradesh High Court – Condom Ad featuring Couple Playing Garba does not Hurt Religious Sentiments

patent-word-cloud-hand-marker-concept-white-background-patent-word-cloud-hand-marker-concept-133806601

December 28, 2022
Sharad Vadehra, Kanu Priya and Aakriti Vadehra

Recent Notices by the Controller General of Patents and Updates in the Practice of the Indian Patent Office

design

December 19, 2022
Sharad Vadehra, Shikha Baiswar, Aakriti Sharma

Industrial Designs – Now Submit Documents and Forms Online

Trademark-Registration-and-Litigation

November 23, 2022
Sharad Vadehra, Rachana Bishnoi, and Pragati

Jurisprudential Aspects of “Shape Mark” under Indian Trade Marks Law

trademark-opposition-india

November 23, 2022
Sharad Vadehra, Rachana Bishnoi, and Pragati

“ZIPOD” vs. “ZOYPOD”: A Strict Test of Deceptive Similarity under Indian Trade Marks Law

November 9, 2022
Admin

Strong-Worded Advisory by the MIB on Advertisements of Online Betting Platforms

Trademark law

November 9, 2022
Sharad Vadehra, Rachana Bishnoi, and Pragati

Delhi High Court decodes Section 36E(5) of Indian Trade Marks Act

seven-seas-tomoe-river-paper-pad-4

November 2, 2022
Sharad Vadehra, Kshitij Saxena, Dr. Neha Gupta

Indian Patent Office must Identify the Known Substance to Objectify the Claimed Compound under Section 3(d) – DS Biopharma Limited v. The Controller of Patents and Designs.

Chinese (Simplified)

Chinese (Traditional)

Kurdish (Kurmanji)

Myanmar (Burmese)

Scottish Gaelic

Reach us at knk@kankrishme.com

knk@kankrishme.com

X