“ZIPOD” vs. “ZOYPOD”: A Strict Test of Deceptive Similarity under Indian Trade Marks Law
Strong-Worded Advisory by the MIB on Advertisements of Online Betting Platforms
Delhi High Court decodes Section 36E(5) of Indian Trade Marks Act
Indian Patent Office must Identify the Known Substance to Objectify the Claimed Compound under Section 3(d) - DS Biopharma Limited v. The Controller of Patents and Designs.
Is it Possible to Reinstate your Patent Application in India?
August's Newsletter
July's Newsletter
AMENDMENT IN SEQUENCE SUBMISSION TOOLS IN INDIA AS PER WIPO STANDARD ST.26
Division on Divisional Application (Dis)Continues – Decision by Delhi High Court (Boehringer Ingelheim International Gmbh v. The Controller of Patents & Anr)
“Gems v. James Bond”: Test of Deceptive Similarity under Trademark Law
